Steering Committee on CSR to review CSR Enforcement
The
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) by an Office Order dated 4th
April 2018 has constituted a twelve member ‘Steering Committee on Corporate
Social Responsibility’ (CSR) under the Chairmanship of Mr. Manmohan Juneja,
Regional Director, MCA, (Western Region), “to review the functioning of CSR
enforcement and to recommend a uniform approach for its enforcement.”
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) by an Office Order dated 4th
April 2018 has constituted a twelve member ‘Steering Committee on Corporate
Social Responsibility’ (CSR) under the Chairmanship of Mr. Manmohan Juneja,
Regional Director, MCA, (Western Region), “to review the functioning of CSR
enforcement and to recommend a uniform approach for its enforcement.”
The
Steering Committee has also been tasked with formulating the structure for a “Centralized
Scrutiny and Prosecution Mechanism” (CSPM). There will also be two
sub-committees, legal and technical, that would go into various aspects of
compliance under the CSR provisions.
Steering Committee has also been tasked with formulating the structure for a “Centralized
Scrutiny and Prosecution Mechanism” (CSPM). There will also be two
sub-committees, legal and technical, that would go into various aspects of
compliance under the CSR provisions.
The
Office Order can be read at:
Office Order can be read at:
The law on CSR in India
The Indian
Companies Act 2013 under section 135 makes Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) compliance mandatory for any company, be it private, public, foreign or
for that matter even a nonprofit company registered under section 8, if the
company meets certain criteria of profit, turnover or net-worth. Reportedly,
India is the only country in the world that mandates CSR under law.
Companies Act 2013 under section 135 makes Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) compliance mandatory for any company, be it private, public, foreign or
for that matter even a nonprofit company registered under section 8, if the
company meets certain criteria of profit, turnover or net-worth. Reportedly,
India is the only country in the world that mandates CSR under law.
Section 135 (The ‘CSR’ clause)
Unfortunately, Section
135 of the Indian Companies Act 2013 reduces CSR to mere arithmetic. During a
block of three fiscal years, if the company has Net-worth of Rs. 500/- crore
or more or Turnover of Rs. 1,000/- crore or more or Net Profit of Rs. 5 crore,
it must:
135 of the Indian Companies Act 2013 reduces CSR to mere arithmetic. During a
block of three fiscal years, if the company has Net-worth of Rs. 500/- crore
or more or Turnover of Rs. 1,000/- crore or more or Net Profit of Rs. 5 crore,
it must:
a) Constitute a CSR
Committee of the Board
Committee of the Board
b) Have a CSR Policy for the
company and disclose contents of such Policy in its report and also place it on
the company’s website, if any.
company and disclose contents of such Policy in its report and also place it on
the company’s website, if any.
c) Ensure that the company
spends, in every financial year, at least two per cent of the average net
profits of the company made during the 3 immediately preceding financial years,
in pursuance of its CSR Policy.
spends, in every financial year, at least two per cent of the average net
profits of the company made during the 3 immediately preceding financial years,
in pursuance of its CSR Policy.
The “escape clause”
If the
company fails to spend on CSR, “the Board shall, in its report made u/s
134(3)(o) shall specify the reasons for not spending the amount”. Many in the
corporate sector earlier viewed this as an “escape clause”. However, in recent
history Ministry of Corporate Affairs has moved beyond its earlier policy of
‘show or shame’ (show that you complied or shame on you for not being
compliant) to cracking the whip with show cause Notices on defaulting companies
asking reasons for failure to spend or not spending enough.
company fails to spend on CSR, “the Board shall, in its report made u/s
134(3)(o) shall specify the reasons for not spending the amount”. Many in the
corporate sector earlier viewed this as an “escape clause”. However, in recent
history Ministry of Corporate Affairs has moved beyond its earlier policy of
‘show or shame’ (show that you complied or shame on you for not being
compliant) to cracking the whip with show cause Notices on defaulting companies
asking reasons for failure to spend or not spending enough.
Move towards “Enforcement”
Clearly
after persuasive talk about CSR being voluntary and the philosophy of “Show or
Shame” the government has now decided to put some teeth into Section 135 of the
Indian Companies Act 2013 which as of the moment allows companies not to spend
on CSR or under-spend and get away simply by providing lame reasons for not
spending or not spending enough.
after persuasive talk about CSR being voluntary and the philosophy of “Show or
Shame” the government has now decided to put some teeth into Section 135 of the
Indian Companies Act 2013 which as of the moment allows companies not to spend
on CSR or under-spend and get away simply by providing lame reasons for not
spending or not spending enough.
MCA
which is the watch-dog on CSR compliance has finally decided to bare its fangs,
four years after Section 135 (popularly known as the CSR clause) came into
force on April 1, 2014. In our view, this move is not entirely unexpected or
misplaced. Over the past four years MCA has been observing a rise in CSR non-compliance
and therefore the time has come to put away the kid gloves and ensure
compliance through “enforcement” under law!
which is the watch-dog on CSR compliance has finally decided to bare its fangs,
four years after Section 135 (popularly known as the CSR clause) came into
force on April 1, 2014. In our view, this move is not entirely unexpected or
misplaced. Over the past four years MCA has been observing a rise in CSR non-compliance
and therefore the time has come to put away the kid gloves and ensure
compliance through “enforcement” under law!
Since
the last two years MCA has been sending Notices to several companies which have
failed to comply with the requirements under section 135. While many companies
have a CSR Committee of the Board and a CSR Policy in place, the reporting on
CSR activities is far from satisfactory.
the last two years MCA has been sending Notices to several companies which have
failed to comply with the requirements under section 135. While many companies
have a CSR Committee of the Board and a CSR Policy in place, the reporting on
CSR activities is far from satisfactory.
CSR Statistics
As
per official data, 6,286 companies spent Rs 4,719 crore towards various CSR
activities in 2016-17. The total number of such projects taken up stood at
11,597.
per official data, 6,286 companies spent Rs 4,719 crore towards various CSR
activities in 2016-17. The total number of such projects taken up stood at
11,597.
Data
of the CSR expenditure of 5,097 companies during the fiscal year 2015-16 as
also the CSR expenditure of 7,334 companies for the Fiscal year 2014-15 (the
first year) can be found at: http://www.mca.gov.in/MinistryV2/csrdatasummary.html
of the CSR expenditure of 5,097 companies during the fiscal year 2015-16 as
also the CSR expenditure of 7,334 companies for the Fiscal year 2014-15 (the
first year) can be found at: http://www.mca.gov.in/MinistryV2/csrdatasummary.html
Terms of Reference for the Committee
Terms
of reference (TOR) for the Steering Committee for CSR includes revisiting Schedule
VII of the Indian Companies Act 2013 which provides an indicative list of CSR
activities which companies may undertake in a project or program mode.
of reference (TOR) for the Steering Committee for CSR includes revisiting Schedule
VII of the Indian Companies Act 2013 which provides an indicative list of CSR
activities which companies may undertake in a project or program mode.
By
itself, Schedule VII is quite wide and varied in terms of scope of activities.
We would not mind if it is further broadened. However, it should not be widened
to accommodate more government schemes and government welfare and development
programs. Already there is option under Schedule VII to contribute to Swach Bharat Kosh set up by the Central
government for the promotion of sanitation, the Clean Ganga Fund set-up by the
Central Government for rejuvenation of the river Ganga and of course the ever
“popular” Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund.
itself, Schedule VII is quite wide and varied in terms of scope of activities.
We would not mind if it is further broadened. However, it should not be widened
to accommodate more government schemes and government welfare and development
programs. Already there is option under Schedule VII to contribute to Swach Bharat Kosh set up by the Central
government for the promotion of sanitation, the Clean Ganga Fund set-up by the
Central Government for rejuvenation of the river Ganga and of course the ever
“popular” Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund.
The
Committee will also revisit guidelines for enforcement of CSR provisions
including the structure for a Centralized Scrutiny and Prosecution Mechanism
(CSPM). This is where the committee needs to ensure that the CSPM focuses on
regulating and not slip into control mode.
Committee will also revisit guidelines for enforcement of CSR provisions
including the structure for a Centralized Scrutiny and Prosecution Mechanism
(CSPM). This is where the committee needs to ensure that the CSPM focuses on
regulating and not slip into control mode.
The
Committee has also been tasked with examining the role and function of the
National Foundation on Corporate Social Responsibility (NFCSR) which operates
under the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA).
Committee has also been tasked with examining the role and function of the
National Foundation on Corporate Social Responsibility (NFCSR) which operates
under the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA).
Our comments/suggestion
Unfortunately neither
Section 135 nor the Company CSR Rules recognize ‘employee engagement’ as CSR.
All over the world, companies proudly report the number of hours contributed by
their employees in community services. However, this is not included even by
way of a footnote when it comes to CSR reporting under law. The Committee
should consider recognizing ‘employee engagement’ under CSR.
Section 135 nor the Company CSR Rules recognize ‘employee engagement’ as CSR.
All over the world, companies proudly report the number of hours contributed by
their employees in community services. However, this is not included even by
way of a footnote when it comes to CSR reporting under law. The Committee
should consider recognizing ‘employee engagement’ under CSR.
Also, companies are not allowed
to spend more than five per cent of their CSR expenditure on administrative
costs or over heads. How is a company with even a CSR budget of one crore
rupees expected to hire capable staff to implement or oversee CSR with just
five lakhs rupees? The committee should increase this threshold or do away with
it.
to spend more than five per cent of their CSR expenditure on administrative
costs or over heads. How is a company with even a CSR budget of one crore
rupees expected to hire capable staff to implement or oversee CSR with just
five lakhs rupees? The committee should increase this threshold or do away with
it.
Finally, we would urge the Committee to focus on
regulating CSR and not get into control mode. The ‘R in’ CSR stands for
“Responsibility” … let it not slip into “Revenue” for the government!
regulating CSR and not get into control mode. The ‘R in’ CSR stands for
“Responsibility” … let it not slip into “Revenue” for the government!
this info is very helpful thanks for sharing
Corporate Social Responsibility is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model. CSR policy functions as a self-regulatory mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law
csr news