Proposed
Amendment under MPTA 1950
“Maharashtra
government may monitor income of all charitable trusts”
government may monitor income of all charitable trusts”
Charitable
organisations in Maharashtra State woke up to read a rather disturbing newsreport
on page four in today’s (18th April 2017) Hindustan Times.
The report can also
be read online at: http://m.hindustantimes.com/mumbai-news/maharashtra-govt-may-monitor-income-of-all-charitable-trusts/story-uLFIRmCHnDz3iYpqtoXWqJ.html
The report is
titled: “Maharashtra government may monitor income of all charitable trusts”.
Hardly have charitable
organisations recovered from the still potential threat of disclosure of
personal assets under the Lokpal Act, when the Maharashtra State Government now
appears to have decided to (according to the report) “monitor the income of
charitable trusts irrespective of the sector they are working in”. Reportedly,
the BJP-led government plans to make it mandatory for charitable trusts to
inform the charity commissioner’s office before accepting any money. How ridiculous
is that?
Allegedly, the state wants to amend the Maharashtra Public Trusts
Act (MPTA) 1950 and the proposal for this is awaiting the state cabinet’s
approval. According to the proposal, all types of charitable trusts will have
to inform the deputy or assistant charity commissioner before accepting any
monetary contribution.
Act (MPTA) 1950 and the proposal for this is awaiting the state cabinet’s
approval. According to the proposal, all types of charitable trusts will have
to inform the deputy or assistant charity commissioner before accepting any
monetary contribution.
The amendment, we are told, will allow the state to monitor the
income of all charitable trusts and ensure the donated amount is spent for the
specified cause only. Our response would be, isn’t that anyway being done? Charitable
trusts in Maharashtra State not only file their audited statements of account
(including Income & Expenditure Statements in the prescribed format) but
also file budgets with the Charity Commissioner every year.
income of all charitable trusts and ensure the donated amount is spent for the
specified cause only. Our response would be, isn’t that anyway being done? Charitable
trusts in Maharashtra State not only file their audited statements of account
(including Income & Expenditure Statements in the prescribed format) but
also file budgets with the Charity Commissioner every year.
A senior state official is reported to have said: “This (amendment)
will also stop misuse of the money and curb corruption in this sector”. A classic case of the proverbial pot calling
the kettle black! Reams could be written about misuse of state funds and
corruption which is rampant across state departments, particularly the
department that regulates charitable trusts in Maharashtra.
will also stop misuse of the money and curb corruption in this sector”. A classic case of the proverbial pot calling
the kettle black! Reams could be written about misuse of state funds and
corruption which is rampant across state departments, particularly the
department that regulates charitable trusts in Maharashtra.
The report adds: “It also proposes punishment for offenders. The
guilty will have to face imprisonment of up to three years and fines of up to
one-and-a-half times the contribution taken from a donor or donors, said a
source.”
guilty will have to face imprisonment of up to three years and fines of up to
one-and-a-half times the contribution taken from a donor or donors, said a
source.”
Supposedly, the state’s move comes after the Centre decided to
change Rule of Foreign Contribution (FCRA) allowing the Union home ministry to
monitor usage of funds that NGOs receive and the central government making it
mandatory for NGOs to maintain their contributory accounts in banks that offer
core banking.
change Rule of Foreign Contribution (FCRA) allowing the Union home ministry to
monitor usage of funds that NGOs receive and the central government making it
mandatory for NGOs to maintain their contributory accounts in banks that offer
core banking.
In our opinion if what is reported is
true, it’s absolutely ridiculous! The State may
“Regulate” charities. However, any endevour to “Control”
(as reported) would be unconstitutional and can and should be challenged.
true, it’s absolutely ridiculous! The State may
“Regulate” charities. However, any endevour to “Control”
(as reported) would be unconstitutional and can and should be challenged.
We will try to obtain copy of the proposed
amendments which are before the Cabinet. In the meantime awareness and public
opinion should be mobilized just the way we did when the sword of the Lokpal Act
loomed over our heads!
amendments which are before the Cabinet. In the meantime awareness and public
opinion should be mobilized just the way we did when the sword of the Lokpal Act
loomed over our heads!
Noshir H. Dadrawala